On the other end, free speech advocates view the ban with great alarm, seeing it as a dangerous precedent for tech giants acting as “arbiters of truth”. Elon Musk, who proclaims himself to be a free speech absolutist (whenever it’s convenient for his self-image), posted to his own platform X: “If we lose freedom of speech, it’s never coming back.”
For all the melodrama that surrounds him, Musk’s sentiment is one that resonates with users who fear that the disinformation cure might be worse than the disease.
As the Australian Human Rights Commission has pointed out, “Drawing a clear line between truth and falsehood is not always simple, and there may be legitimate differences in opinion.” In other words, one person’s disinformation might be another’s hard-hitting expose. There has to be an objective truth, but moderating for it isn’t an easy prospect.
What makes this situation particularly thorny is the global reach of platforms such as Facebook and Instagram. When Meta makes a decision, it doesn’t just impact a handful of users or a single channel – it has consequences around the globe. Through the ban, RT alone lost over 7.2 million followers on Facebook, and another million on Instagram.
According to the Australian Media Literacy Alliance, 80 per cent of Australians are concerned about the spread of disinformation on social media. So, the pressure to address the issue of disinformation on social media platforms is mounting, from both users and public agencies.
Social media and the internet have given a voice to millions who were once left out of the conversation. They’ve brought together communities across the globe and made information more accessible than ever before – something we couldn’t have imagined even a few decades ago.
Loading
What makes these platforms so powerful is their ability to cultivate open expression and tear down barriers. It’s a noble idea, and worth defending. But for every heartwarming story of long-lost school friends reunited or grassroots movements gaining traction, there is a Cambridge Analytica scandal, or disinformation spreading like wildfire. And Meta has now, in effect, become a gatekeeper of global discourse, a role it is neither suited to, nor was elected to fulfil.
The ban on RT and Rossiya Segodnya won’t be the last word when it comes to online disinformation. The challenge now is in maintaining the openness of the internet, while curbing harmful content and propaganda.
Defending Russia’s propaganda as free speech is shortsighted nonsense. But Meta’s ban raises pertinent questions about where and how we draw the line for online expression, the role of governments in policing the digital realm, and the responsibility platforms have in combating and responding to disinformation in an era where truth seems increasingly elusive.
Joan Westenberg is a freelance writer.
The Opinion newsletter is a weekly wrap of views that will challenge, champion and inform your own. Sign up here.
