Tomorrow: Each electoral system has faults and advantages .. It affirms: The relative list has serious defects
Adel Esmat, media spokesman & nbsp; and the political advisor of the tomorrow’s party, confirmed that the relative list is not commensurate with our political and constitutional condition & nbsp; indicating that the relative menu was previously tried, and it resulted in very serious defects. & nbsp; & nbsp;
Esmat said in a special statement to & quot; Al -Youssef & quot;, each electoral system has its disadvantages and advantages, so an electoral system is not without disadvantages, and there is no better electoral system than a system, explaining that & nbsp; there is an electoral system & nbsp; suitable for political reality & nbsp; and the constitutional reality, and another that is not commensurate with them, and when we choose a specific system, our choice is not its meaning We prefer it permanently.
& nbsp; Introduction, what we can call & laquo; the nature of the stage politically & raquo; and taking into account: & nbsp;
& nbsp;
& bull; First: to choose an electoral system & quot & quot; Simple your voter, an uncomplicated and unbelieving system.
& nbsp;
& bull; Second: A system that encourages your citizens to participate, cast and engage, in the electoral process and to be counted to the possibility of voters for the entire operation.
& nbsp;
& bull; Third: Improving these circumstances or what we call (the general climate), during which the electoral process takes place, and to increase the guarantees and transparency and do everything that would support confidence in all stages of the entire electoral process, and are keen to provide adequate guarantees for voters and candidates together at the same time. It comes with independent deputies that are not united by a university, and they are not included in safe, natural, natural and known political directions, programs or directions The late departs completely, neglect and refuse to cooperate, and make any effort, as they refrain from participating and engaging in the burdens of the electoral process.
& nbsp; Esmat said: & quot; it imposes going without discussion to the system (absolute closed menu), so that you can achieve these classes, and therefore you will find yourself forced to the absolute menu system by a rate of not less than 40 %, for example, in order to be able to achieve the constitutional proportions of the seven categories to distinguish them positive Naabi & quot; noting that in & in this case, 60 % of the seats for the relative menu system will remain, which will decide the matter for the individual, but 40 % is an absolute list and 60 % individual & nbsp; an unacceptable percentage at a time when we seek to enable political parties. The nature of the political system stipulated in the constitution in its fifth article, which is that the political system in Egypt is established on the basis of (political and partisan pluralism), and not the multiplicity of (independents), and that would lead to an attempt to empower political parties and support them and reduce the individual phenomenon, and therefore it will go immediately to the size of the absolute list at the expense of the individual, and incompatibility that the individual system shares the percentage with the list The absolute, and you will go to the penalty of the list’s share at the expense of the individual system, so the percentage will turn to 60 % in the list absolute and 40 % individual, but that leads to the large size and breadth of the individual circle.
& nbsp; 100 % absolute & nbsp; With the complete abolition of the individual, in order to avoid the large size of the individual circles & quot;
& nbsp;
& nbsp; that the equivalent between the two absolute and individual system & nbsp; 50 % for the lists and 50 % for the individual & nbsp; my party & nbsp; independent, will not fit and the system of government in Constitution.
