Economy

Messages show how powerful union slugged workers’ retirement savings

On December 17, 2019, O’Connor sent an email approving the CFMEU to advertise for a vacant position as a member and employer co-ordinator, although it wasn’t until February 2020 that the board of First Super gave the nod to begin negotiations with the union to extend the contract for another two years.

Before the position was filled, O’Connor instructed CS to send an invoice to First Super as part of the MESC contract for the period between April and June.

“The union issued an invoice to the trustee which included the cost of an additional co-ordinator TBA [to be announced],” APRA has alleged. “The invoice INV-0156 dated 10 March 2020 contained a line item for VIC/TAS TBA – $125,051.56.”

O’Connor shortly after withdrew the job ad. By then, he had spoken to a union employee, referred to in court documents as BT, about the possibility of her being effectively seconded to First Super “but doing both work as a MESC co-ordinator and work forming part of her role as an MSR [member support and retention] organiser for the union”. She began in that role from early April 2020.

In late March, O’Connor also met with a consultant to discuss how the union could raise its contract fees. The union presented its revised offer to the fund in late April 2020, which included a 5 per cent fee hike and an additional one-off roll-over fee of $350,000, on the advice of the consultant.

APRA has alleged O’Connor was quietly involved in negotiations on behalf of the union “with the intention of benefiting the union at the expense of First Super and its members’ interests”, amounting to a breach of his directors’ duties.

Lots of work for the union, little work for the super fund

The regulator has compiled 275 messages BT sent to the CFMEU Slack channel that it says shows the employee, who was effectively seconded to First Super, worked predominantly on union-related matters.

The vast majority of her messages, released by APRA, relate to her role as a union organiser.

APRA has alleged BT “did little work in her role as a MESC co-ordinator”, until her resignation on October 15, 2021.

Despite her secondment, O’Connor – and other union staffers – still viewed BT as a CFMEU employee, according to emails released by APRA.

The national secretary has been accused of directly reaching out to BT and instructing her to undertake union-related work, including on November 23, 2020, when he told her to post a video on the union’s Facebook page with an approved message and on November 27 when he instructed her to prepare a list of Vietnamese-speaking members for small factories.

But by the end of 2020, First Super began questioning what BT was up to.

It is not clear from the court documents how O’Connor responded, but APRA said it is “inferred” the national secretary read the email, and he knew the inquiry was related to BT’s “failure to perform work in her MESC co-ordinator role”.

Two months later, however, O’Connor asked BT to help him review the union’s process for joining new members, according to the regulator.

The matter is listed for a first case management hearing in April.

APRA declined to comment. First Super has been contacted for comment. O’Connor is yet to file his defence and hasn’t responded to requests for comment.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

  • For more: Elrisala website and for social networking, you can follow us on Facebook
  • Source of information and images “brisbanetimes”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button

Discover more from Elrisala

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading