Judge blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE team from fraud ‘fishing expedition’ at Social Security: ‘Hitting a fly with a sledgehammer’
A federal judge has temporarily blocked Elon Musk and his so-called Department of Government Efficiency from their “fishing expedition” in search of a “fraud epidemic” based on “little more than suspicion” inside the Social Security Administration.
A temporary restraining order from District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander prevents the world’s wealthiest man and his team of 10 at Social Security — which Musk has baselessly labeled a “Ponzi scheme” handing out tens of billions of dollars in retirement benefits to dead people — from “unfettered” access to personal information for millions of Americans.
U.S. DOGE Service employees at the nation’s retirement and disability agency currently have access to Americans’ Social Security data or “personally identifiable information,” government lawyers said this month.
Their level of access “provides no avenues” to change beneficiary data or payments, but gives them the ability to “review records needed to detect fraud,” lawyers wrote in court filings March 12.
DOGE supporters may be applauding Donald Trump’s mission “to root out fraud, waste, and bloat from federal agencies, including [Social Security], to the extent it exists. But, by what means and methods?” Judge Hollander wrote Thursday.
“The DOGE team is essentially engaged in a fishing expedition at [the agency], in search of a fraud epidemic, based on little more than suspicion. It has launched a search for the proverbial needle in the haystack, without any concrete knowledge that the needle is actually in the haystack,” she added.
The team has “unbridled access to the personal and private data of millions of Americans,” but has “never identified or articulated even a single reason” why DOGE would need “unlimited access” to Social Security’s entire record systems, which would risk “exposing personal, confidential, sensitive, and private information that millions of Americans entrusted to their government,” the judge wrote in her ruling.
“Indeed, the government has not even attempted to explain why a more tailored, measured, titrated approach is not suitable to the task,” she said. “Its method of doing so is tantamount to hitting a fly with a sledgehammer.”
She noted that the government has fought to conceal the identifies of DOGE staff “because defendants are concerned that the disclosure of even their names would expose them to harassment and thus invade their privacy.”
“The defense does not appear to share a privacy concern for the millions of Americans whose [Social Security] records were made available to the DOGE affiliates, without their consent, and which contain sensitive, confidential, and personally identifiable information,” she wrote.
The DOGE team at Social Security includes four “special government employees” and six people detailed to the agency from other offices. Officials at the agency declined to name the employees “to protect the privacy of these individuals, and to avoid exposing them to threats and harassment,” according to a sworn statement from deputy commissioner Florence Felix-Lawson.
A political appointee, a software engineer and “experts” are reviewing Social Security’s “death master file” to find payments to dead Americans, Felix-Lawson wrote.
“The overall goal” of the DOGE team inside Social Security “is to detect fraud, waste and abuse,” according to a sworn statement from the agency’s chief technology officer Michael Russo. “This level of access ensures these employees can review records needed to detect fraud but does not allow them the ability to make any changes to beneficiary data or payment files.”
Trump and administration officials have repeatedly suggested looming cuts to Social Security as well as federal health programs like Medicare and Medicaid in an attempt to justify significant cuts to federal spending.
