The ABC’s former content chief found himself “between a rock and a hard place” after former chair Ita Buttrose sent a flurry of complaints about Antoniette Lattouf to him directly, while the organisation’s editorial policy expert advised him she had not breached any guidelines.
“Complaints were coming into me directly from the chair’s office,” Chris Oliver-Taylor told the court during an astonishing day of cross-examination, saying he had “no idea why” Buttrose was telling complainants that he was dealing with the Lattouf matter directly.
“I think the way that this was exercised through the chair writing to me and naming me, was I felt, unusual,” Oliver-Taylor said.
During the proceedings on Friday, Oliver-Taylor confirmed that ABC’s acting editorial director Simon Melkman had assured him that Lattouf had not broken any of the ABC’s social media or editorial policies.
He insisted he had not formed a view whether the content posted on Lattouf’s social media was impartial or not, whether it breached any of the ABC’s editorial or social media policies, and that he was not qualified to make this judgement, as he was not an expert on the subject of the Israel-Gaza conflict.
Oliver-Taylor has been positioned as the sole decision-maker by the ABC in its defence of the case brought by Lattouf, while the freelance journalist’s legal team has argued both Buttrose and outgoing managing director David Anderson were also decision makers.
The ABC’s former content chief, who announced his resignation in January, was the sole witness on the fifth day of proceedings in Lattouf’s unlawful termination case against the ABC in the Federal Court. His appearance was critiqued by Lattouf’s barrister Oshie Fagir throughout, at one point describing his evidence as “shambolic”, and asking if he had been coached or practised his lines.
He admitted there was “pressure from above”, after Buttrose had told him “we’ll keep getting these complaints until Antoinette leaves”.
He said he “didn’t like” a number of the comments made by Buttrose, which included correspondence asking “has she been replaced yet?” as well as pushing back on suggestions she should be taken off-air prematurely. Oliver-Taylor suggested the blowback from such a move would be “phenomenal”.