DOJ official defends alleged quid pro quo with NYC mayor Eric Adams as judge hauls prosecutors to court to discuss case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
A top Department of Justice official denied engaging with an alleged quid pro quo with New York City Mayor Eric Adams but said it would still be OK, as lawyers were dragged to court on Wednesday over the move to dismiss his bribery charges.
Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove III and an attorney for Adams were in federal court to answer questions about dropping the five-count indictment against the mayor.
Bove, a former criminal defense lawyer for President Donald Trump, ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to motion to dismiss the case last week, arguing the New York City mayor was needed to help Trump carry out his agenda – especially as it pertains to immigration. When prosecutors in New York refused, he turned to the Justice Department.
Sitting before District Judge Dale Ho on Wednesday, Bove denied the Manhattan prosecutor’s allegation that he struck a deal with Adams to drop the indictment in exchange for his help but said even if he head, it wouldn’t matter.
“I don’t concede that even if there was a quid pro quo, there would be an issue with this motion,” Bove said.
Judges typically do not have the power to deny the government’s motion to dismiss but they may hold hearings on it to get further clarification.
Federal prosecutors are seeking to drop the charges against Adams at the direction of Trump, who the mayor has controversially recently struck up a friendly relationship with.
But controversy was turned up a notch last week when five federal prosecutors in the DoJ and two in the Southern District of New York resigned instead of signing documents to drop the charges at Bove’s request.
Danielle Sassoon, the Trump-appointed former acting U.S. attorney of SDNY, told Attorney General Pam Bondi she had witnessed Adams’s attorney and Bove engaged in “what amounted to a quid pro quo” to have the case axed.
The acting deputy attorney general reiterated over and over to Judge Ho there was an “undisputed” record of such quid pro quo.
He reiterated over and over again to Judge Ho the importance of dismissing the charges against Adams so the mayor could obtain security clearance again and begin working to help carry out Trump’s immigration agenda.
Judge Ho quizzed Adams, the mayor’s attorney and Bove over the allegations. He asked the mayor if anyone had promised him anything or threatened him in return for consenting to the motion to dismiss the case.
Adams said he had not and even assured Judge Ho that he was confident the charges would not be brought in the future if the judge signed off on the motion.
“I have not committed a crime. I don’t see them bringing it back. I’m not afraid of that,” Adams said.
The New York City mayor was all smiles on Wednesday as he strode into the courthouse, despite groups of people screaming and booing at him as he walked up the stone staircase into the courthouse.
Even after the roughly hour-and-half-long hearing, he flashed his signature thumbs up to reporters as he left court.
Judge Ho said he would decide whether or not to approve the motion to dismiss at a later date.
Adams was indicted last year on five criminal counts for allegedly accepting travel benefits from the Turkish government in exchange for helping expedite the building of the Turkish consulate. He was also accused of accepting campaign donations from an illegal straw donor scheme.
The mayor denied the allegations and pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Adams quickly took Trump’s position of accusing the Justice Department of bringing the charges for political reasons – both men have sought to crack down on immigration.
Since Trump was elected, rumors have swirled over whether the case against Adams would be dismissed or if the mayor would be pardoned.
